A blow bar that “looks right” on the receiving bench can still fail on locking notch position, hardness traverse, or an unmarked heat. Pocket fit is not flight-ready. First-article inspection (FAI) on impact castings costs less than a shattered rotor incident and less than arguing about a campaign that never should have started.

This page is a receiving / FAI playbook for QA inspectors at mines, quarries, and dealer warehouses — and for buyers writing supplier quality clauses. Alloy choice stays on the HSI blow bar material selection matrix. How to read HRC/HB and toughness stays on hardness testing. Pass/fail gates and the document pack live here. Identity for reorder and reject-replace stays part number / model match. Hardness and tolerance numbers below are example gates / buyer-agreed ranges, not universal guarantees.

Answer first: what should FAI include?

Q: What should a blow bar first-article inspection include?
A: Agree gates for critical dimensions (especially locking notch and pocket fit), a multi-point hardness map on the working face and near retainers, visual/NDT for cracks and inclusions, and a document pack (dims, hardness, heat/material, markings). Reject unmarked or out-of-gate bars before they reach the rotor. Reorder by part number / model match.

When FAI applies

Run full FAI when any of these is true:

  • New pattern or new revision
  • New alloy family on an existing PN family
  • New supplier or new melt source
  • First lot after a process or tooling change
  • Prior fit, breakage, or hardness complaint on that identity

After a stable FAI pass, later lots can follow an agreed sample plan — but unmarked bars and notch-critical dims should never become “visual only.”

Related impact-family change-out discipline (VSI tips / anvils / plates) is on the VSI replacement checklist. Fitment proof language for model-match castings in general is on the fitment proof / RE checkpoints page.

Table A — Feature priority (what deserves a gate)

Feature Why it matters Typical control
Overall length / width / thickness Clears rotor pocket Linear dims + stock allowance note
Locking notch / retainer geometry Holds bar at speed Position, form, template
Mounting faces / radii Contact & stress Flatness / profile
Ends & corners Crack starters Visual + radius check
Marking (heat / alloy / PN) Traceability Permanent mark present & legible

Notch and retainer geometry sit at the top of the risk list for in-rotor breakage. A bar that is only “within length” but off on notch position is not a pass.

Table B — Dimensional incoming sheet (example columns)

Use placeholder nominals tied to the approved drawing — do not invent a fake machine drawing. Copy this blank sheet into your receiving form.

Dim ID Nom (example) Tol (example) Method Measured Pass?
L1 length per approved drawing Rev X ± agreed Tape / CMM
T1 thickness @ zone A per approved drawing Rev X ± agreed Mic / ultrasonic
N1 notch position per approved drawing Rev X positional Template / CMM
F1 face flatness per approved drawing Rev X mm (agreed) Straight edge

General casting CT / datum practice is covered in casting dimensional tolerances. Apply those ideas to the blow-bar features above; keep the gate list short enough that receiving actually runs it.

Table C — Hardness traverse gates (indicative)

Zone What to ask Risk if skipped
Working face mid HB or HRC per alloy family Soft face → short life
Near notch / retainer Local hardness + visual Brittle notch → breakage
Core / opposite face (as agreed) Confirm through-harden or intended gradient Misleading single spot
Map density ≥3–5 points agreed on FAI Cherry-picked certificate

Important: manganese and high-chrome expected patterns differ. Mn often looks “soft” as-supplied and work-hardens in service; high-chrome reports much higher HRC with lower toughness. Do not rank families on one HRC number — see hardness testing for method and HSI matrix for alloy choice. Agree scale (HB vs HRC), locations, and minimum map density in the purchase order before the lot ships.

Table D — Visual / NDT cues

Cue Action
Shrink / hot tear on working face Quarantine; photo; supplier disposition
Sand inclusions at notch Reject or grind-only if procedure allows
Unmarked heat / missing PN stamp Hold — no traceability
Grind burns / blueing Check hardness locally
Crack indications (MT/PT if in PO) Follow PO NDT clause

Surface finish expectations (grind, shot, as-cast notes) are summarized in casting surface finishing. Spec language for grades can reference cast steel grade equivalents without dumping full chemistry tables into the receiving form.

Table E — Document pack to request

Document Purpose
Dimensional FAI report Measured vs drawing
Hardness map Points + method + scale
Material cert / heat Traceability (desensitized examples only in shared packs)
Heat-treat record Process confirmation
Visual / NDT record As purchased
Photos of markings Match PN / model match

A real pack contains measured values, method notes, and legible marking photos. A single-spot hardness line with no map is not an FAI pack.

Table F — Disposition & RFQ follow-up

Result Next step
Pass FAI Release; keep pack with lot
Conditional Written deviation + use-as-is / rework
Fail Quarantine; photo set; reorder by PN / model match
Recurring fail Escalate alloy / pattern / foundry process — see fitment proof

For reject-replace orders, use the PN / model-match RFQ fields and attach the failed FAI photos and dim sheet. Fictional placeholder only: PN-BLOW-EX-001 / model match — never present catalog competitor numbers as foundry SKUs.

Tie to alloy choice (one paragraph)

FAI does not pick the alloy. If breakage clusters near the notch on a high-chrome bar in high-impact duty, or if face wash is extreme on manganese in fine abrasion, revisit the HSI material matrix after you confirm the bar met dimensional and hardness gates. Do not use FAI failure as a silent alloy change without a written revision.

FAQ

HB vs HRC on high-chrome — which should receiving use?

Use the scale agreed on the drawing or PO. High-chrome is commonly reported in HRC; manganese more often in HB. Conversions are approximate — if the PO says HB, ask for HB. Method detail: hardness testing.

Is a single-spot hardness cert enough for FAI?

No. Agree a multi-point map (typically three to five or more points) covering working face and near-retainer zones. Single-spot certs are easy to cherry-pick and miss notch-adjacent soft or brittle regions.

Can receiving skip CMM if a template exists?

For notch and pocket-critical features, a calibrated template or CMM (as agreed) is the control. Tape-only checks on length are not a substitute for notch position. Match method to the feature risk in Table A.

What if the drawing is missing — can we use a worn sample?

A worn sample can support reverse-engineering and a new agreed dim list, but it is not a silent substitute for Rev X. Escalate to a fitment proof / RE flow with photos and marking evidence before releasing a first lot.

What sample size after FAI pass?

Agree it in the PO. Typical practice: full FAI on first article, then a defined sample per lot. Critical notches and markings remain mandatory checks even on reduced sampling.

How fast can a replacement lot ship after a fail?

It depends on stock, pattern status, and whether the failure was dimensional, hardness, or marking. Ask for a written week range on the reorder quote. This page does not invent day counts.

Should unmarked bars ever be installed “to keep the plant up”?

No. No heat / PN stamp means no traceability for claims, no link to hardness/material certs, and no safe disposition trail. Hold unmarked bars.

Close

Run Tables B–E on the receiving bench before bars reach the rotor. Notch geometry, multi-point hardness, visual/NDT, and a real document pack beat “looks identical.” Reorder and claims stay on part number / model match.

GUBT is a source foundry for model-match impact wear castings. To request a foundry FAI pack with your next order, send drawing Rev + PN / model match + duty notes to info@gubtcasting.com or Contact Us.